Creep characterization of vapor-grown carbon nanofiber/vinyl ester nanocomposites using a response surface methodology

From EVOCD
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(13 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|abstract=  
 
|abstract=  
 
[[Image:CCD_Design.jpg|thumb|300px|right| Central Composite Design. ]]
 
[[Image:CCD_Design.jpg|thumb|300px|right| Central Composite Design. ]]
TThe effects of selected factors such as vapor-grown carbon nanofiber (VGCNF) weight fraction, applied stress, and temperature
+
The effects of selected factors such as vapor-grown carbon nanofiber (VGCNF) weight fraction, applied stress, and temperature
 
on the viscoelastic responses (creep strain and creep compliance) of VGCNF/vinyl ester (VE) nanocomposites were studied
 
on the viscoelastic responses (creep strain and creep compliance) of VGCNF/vinyl ester (VE) nanocomposites were studied
 
using a central composite design (CCD). Nanocomposite test articles were fabricated by high-shear mixing, casting, curing, and post curing in an open-face mold under a nitrogen environment. Short-term creep/creep recovery experiments were conducted at prescribed combinations of temperature (23.8–69.2C), applied stress (30.2–49.8 MPa), and VGCNF weight fraction (0.00–1.00 parts of VGCNF per hundred parts of resin) determined from the CCD. Response surface models (RSMs) for predicting these viscoelastic responses were developed using the least squares method and an analysis of variance procedure. The response surface estimates indicate that increasing the VGCNF weight fraction marginally increases the creep resistance of the VGCNF/VE nanocomposite at low temperatures (i.e., 23.8–46.5C). However, increasing the VGCNF weight fraction decreased the creep resistance of these nanocomposites for temperatures greater than 50C. The latter response may be due to a decrease in the nanofiber-to-matrix adhesion as the temperature is increased. The RSMs for creep strain and creep compliance revealed the interactions between the VGCNF weight fraction, stress, and temperature on the creep behavior of thermoset polymer nanocomposites. The design of experiments approach is useful in revealing interactions between selected factors, and thus can facilitate the development of more physics-based models.
 
using a central composite design (CCD). Nanocomposite test articles were fabricated by high-shear mixing, casting, curing, and post curing in an open-face mold under a nitrogen environment. Short-term creep/creep recovery experiments were conducted at prescribed combinations of temperature (23.8–69.2C), applied stress (30.2–49.8 MPa), and VGCNF weight fraction (0.00–1.00 parts of VGCNF per hundred parts of resin) determined from the CCD. Response surface models (RSMs) for predicting these viscoelastic responses were developed using the least squares method and an analysis of variance procedure. The response surface estimates indicate that increasing the VGCNF weight fraction marginally increases the creep resistance of the VGCNF/VE nanocomposite at low temperatures (i.e., 23.8–46.5C). However, increasing the VGCNF weight fraction decreased the creep resistance of these nanocomposites for temperatures greater than 50C. The latter response may be due to a decrease in the nanofiber-to-matrix adhesion as the temperature is increased. The RSMs for creep strain and creep compliance revealed the interactions between the VGCNF weight fraction, stress, and temperature on the creep behavior of thermoset polymer nanocomposites. The design of experiments approach is useful in revealing interactions between selected factors, and thus can facilitate the development of more physics-based models.
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
Corresponding Author: [Sullivan@ae.msstate.edu Rani W. Sulivan, Ph.D.]
 
Corresponding Author: [Sullivan@ae.msstate.edu Rani W. Sulivan, Ph.D.]
 +
 +
|material model= Use a central composite design of experiments approach ([[Metamodeling]]) to determine the viscoelastic behavior of vinyl ester nanocomposites.
 +
 +
|input deck= Simulations are not required as this paper is purely experimental.
  
 
|animation=
 
|animation=
Line 16: Line 20:
 
{{paper_figure|image=Stages_Of_Creep.jpg|image caption=Figure 1. Stages of Creep.}}
 
{{paper_figure|image=Stages_Of_Creep.jpg|image caption=Figure 1. Stages of Creep.}}
  
|methodology= For each grain boundary structure, the crystal orientations and their relationship to the grain boundary plane -- five degrees of freedom -- are often used to describe the grain boundary character. A three-dimensional periodic simulation cell is used for these calculations (see Fig. 1), whereby there are two crystal orientations and two grain boundaries (one in the middle and one at the top/bottom). This simulation cell allows the user to manipulate the five grain boundary degrees of freedom to investigate their relationship on properties. The distance between the two boundaries must be large enough for the grain boundary energy to converge, i.e., in the input script below, a distance of 12 nm was used.
+
|methodology= To model the viscoelastic behavioral response of the nanocomposites, creep experiments were performed at varying stress levels and temperatures. The creep strain and compliance were modeled using a Prony series representation in conjunction with the Boltzmann superposition principle (BSP). Creep strains and creep compliances were selected at varying times and modeled using a central composite design of experiments approach. This design of experiments approach allowed for the development of response surface models of the creep compliance and creep strain. These are seen in the images below
Figure 2. This is a plot of the accessibility of each grain boundary structure for an asymmetric tilt grain boundary. For complex boundaries, a large number of boundaries may need to be sampled to find the "global" minimum energy boundary.
+
 
+
In many cases, at the atomistic level, the minimum energy structure cannot be found by merely adjoining the two crystal lattices in the simulation cell. The relative translation of the two crystal lattices with respect to each other is important as well as the number of atoms within the grain boundary region. Therefore, to find the minimum energy structure, a large number of configurations with different relative translations is vital to finding the stable minimum energy structure and not just a metastable grain boundary structure. Figure 2 shows an example for an asymmetric tilt grain boundary, where the minimum energy structure was only found (accessed) 8.76% of the time with various translations. In more complex boundaries, the accessibility may be less than 0.1%.
+
 
+
The following input script shows how multiple translations and an atom deletion criteria are used to calculate the minimum energy structure. This input script for LAMMPS<ref>S. Plimpton, "Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics," J. Comp. Phys., 117, 1-19 (1995). </ref> can be called with a command of the form, "lmp_exe < input.script." This script contains loops over x-translations, z-translations, and atom overlap distances (an atom is deleted when an atom pair with a nearest neighbor distance is less than this distance). The unique minimum energy structures are saved as a dump file with the energy appended to the filename in a new folder specified by the 'gbname' variable. The dump files can then be easily scanned through for the global minimum energy structure.
+
 
+
|material model=
+
{{Template:LAMMPS}}
+
 
+
 
+
|input deck= See [[LAMMPS Input Deck for Grain boundary generation]]
+
 
+
  
 
|results=  
 
|results=  
 
<table width="100%" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="5">
 
<table width="100%" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="5">
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td colspan="2">This methodology has resulted in structures that agree with HRTEM images and grain boundary energies that agree with experimentally-measured grain boundary energies. Figure 3 shows an example plot of the grain boundary energy versus inclination angle for a complex grain boundaries in Cu (Sigma 3 asymmetric grain boundaries). This system of boundaries displays a phase transformation at the boundary to the orthorhombic 9R phase for inclination angles of 70-90 degrees. The methodology used above agrees nicely with experimental results and previous atomistic calculations of Wolf and coworkers.  
+
<td colspan="2"> The creep strain and creep compliance as a function of the vapor-grown carbon nanofiber (VGCNF) weight fraction and temperature are shown below.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
Line 54: Line 46:
  
  
|acknowledgement=M.A. Tschopp would like to acknowledge funding provided under an NSF graduate fellowship for the initial work. Continued funding for investigating structure-property relationships in grain boundaries under the NEAMS (Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation) program is also acknowledged.  
+
|acknowledgement=Support from the Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems at Mississippi State University is gratefully acknowledged  
 +
 
 +
|references=
 +
 
 +
D. Drake, R.W. Sullivan, H. Toghiani, S. Nouranian, T.E. Lacy, C. U. Pittman, Jr., J.L. DuBien, J. Simsiriwong. “Creep Compliance Characterization of Vapor-Grown Carbon Nanofiber/Vinyl Ester Nanocomposites Using a Central Composite Design of Experiments,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 132, 42162, doi: 10.1002/app.42162.
 +
 
 +
 
  
|references= The initial methodology was used in the following papers:
 
 
}}
 
}}
  
Line 62: Line 59:
 
[[Category: Research Paper]]
 
[[Category: Research Paper]]
 
[[Category: macroscale]]
 
[[Category: macroscale]]
 +
[[Category: Metamodeling]]
 +
[[Category: Polymers]]

Latest revision as of 10:43, 12 April 2017

AbstractMethodologyMaterial ModelInput DataResultsAcknowledgmentsReferences

Abstract

Central Composite Design.

The effects of selected factors such as vapor-grown carbon nanofiber (VGCNF) weight fraction, applied stress, and temperature on the viscoelastic responses (creep strain and creep compliance) of VGCNF/vinyl ester (VE) nanocomposites were studied using a central composite design (CCD). Nanocomposite test articles were fabricated by high-shear mixing, casting, curing, and post curing in an open-face mold under a nitrogen environment. Short-term creep/creep recovery experiments were conducted at prescribed combinations of temperature (23.8–69.2C), applied stress (30.2–49.8 MPa), and VGCNF weight fraction (0.00–1.00 parts of VGCNF per hundred parts of resin) determined from the CCD. Response surface models (RSMs) for predicting these viscoelastic responses were developed using the least squares method and an analysis of variance procedure. The response surface estimates indicate that increasing the VGCNF weight fraction marginally increases the creep resistance of the VGCNF/VE nanocomposite at low temperatures (i.e., 23.8–46.5C). However, increasing the VGCNF weight fraction decreased the creep resistance of these nanocomposites for temperatures greater than 50C. The latter response may be due to a decrease in the nanofiber-to-matrix adhesion as the temperature is increased. The RSMs for creep strain and creep compliance revealed the interactions between the VGCNF weight fraction, stress, and temperature on the creep behavior of thermoset polymer nanocomposites. The design of experiments approach is useful in revealing interactions between selected factors, and thus can facilitate the development of more physics-based models.

Author(s): Daniel A. Drake, Rani W. Sullivan, Thomas E. Lacy, Charles U. Pittman, Jr., Hossein Toghiani, Janice L. DuBien, Sasan Nouranian, Jutima Simsiriwong

Corresponding Author: [Sullivan@ae.msstate.edu Rani W. Sulivan, Ph.D.]


Figure 1. Stages of Creep. (click on the image to enlarge).

Methodology

To model the viscoelastic behavioral response of the nanocomposites, creep experiments were performed at varying stress levels and temperatures. The creep strain and compliance were modeled using a Prony series representation in conjunction with the Boltzmann superposition principle (BSP). Creep strains and creep compliances were selected at varying times and modeled using a central composite design of experiments approach. This design of experiments approach allowed for the development of response surface models of the creep compliance and creep strain. These are seen in the images below

Material Model

Use a central composite design of experiments approach (Metamodeling) to determine the viscoelastic behavior of vinyl ester nanocomposites.

Input Data

Simulations are not required as this paper is purely experimental.

Results

The creep strain and creep compliance as a function of the vapor-grown carbon nanofiber (VGCNF) weight fraction and temperature are shown below.
Creep Compliance as a Function of Temperature and VGCNF Weight Fraction.
Creep Strain as a Function of Temperature and VGCNF Weight Fraction.

Acknowledgments

Support from the Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems at Mississippi State University is gratefully acknowledged

References

D. Drake, R.W. Sullivan, H. Toghiani, S. Nouranian, T.E. Lacy, C. U. Pittman, Jr., J.L. DuBien, J. Simsiriwong. “Creep Compliance Characterization of Vapor-Grown Carbon Nanofiber/Vinyl Ester Nanocomposites Using a Central Composite Design of Experiments,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 132, 42162, doi: 10.1002/app.42162.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
home
Materials
Material Models
Design
Resources
Projects
Education
Toolbox