1010 Steel

From EVOCD
Revision as of 14:57, 14 March 2016 by Aslam (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Stress-Strain Data

Stress-Strain Data

1010 Steel, quasi-static tension stress-strain data =


Quasi-static tests were performed at ambient conditions on a MTS Servo hydraulic machine equipped with an 11 kip actuator. Load was measured with a load cell calibrated over an appropriate range. A slack adapter allowed the actuator to attain test speed before applying load to the specimen. Strain was measured using back-to back strain gauges bonded on the specimen Postyield strain was measured using a lightweight mechanical extensometer. Data from the extensometer and strain gauge were averaged to compensate for bending.
TSSASR.png

Figure 1. True stress - true strain curves for Tension for 1010 Steel at a strain rates of ~1 from two tests.

TSSDT.png

Figure 2. True stress - true strain curves for Tension for 1010 Steel at a strain rates of ~1100 at various temperatures.

1010 Steel, compression stress-strain data


The material of specimens was AISI 1010. It was provided by industrial manufacturer as cold drawn cylindrical bar. The strain/stress relationship of AISI 1010 steelwas obtained by uniaxial compression test (see Fig. 3). In the large strain region of this material (ε > 0.64), the flowstress is assumed constant.

CSS.png

Figure 3. True stress - true strain curves of AISI 1010 by uniaxial comporession test

1010 Steel, torsion stress-strain data


Materials used in this study are two kinds of AISI 1010 steels (0.1 pct low-carbon steels) having a ferrite-pearlite structure. The chemical compositions are listed in Table I. They were fabricated in rods 120 mm in diameter; one was processed by converter steel making and hot rolling, while the other was processed by electric furnace steel making and hot rolling. For convenience, the former is referred to as A-Steel, and the latter B-Steel.

TSSTS.png

Figure 4. Shear stress-shear strain curves obtained from the dynamic torsional tests for the two steels

Fatigue Data

FSN.png

Figure 5. Comparison of thermal-mechanical and isothermal fatigue resistance of 1010 steel based on stress amplitude

FSSDT.png

Figure 6. Cyclic stress-strain behavior of 1010 steel under in-phase thermal –mechanical cycling

FSNmaxmin(a).png

FSNmaxmin(b).png

Figure 4. In-phase cycle (a), the magnitude of peak compressive stress was greater than magnitude of peak tensile stress. The opposite was true for the out of phase cycle (b).

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
home
Materials
Material Models
Design
Resources
Projects
Education
Toolbox